Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01839
Original file (PD2012 01839.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME:    CASE: PD1201839
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army  BOARD DATE: 20130430
SEPARATION DATE: 20040604


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SGT/E-5 (74D20/Nuclear Biological Specialist) medically separated for a low back condition. The CI started having a gradual onset of low back pain (LBP) since 2001. He was treated with anti-inflammatory and profiles of mostly no push-ups or sit-ups. He was sent to Iraq and lifted a one ton generator. The LBP worsened, at that time, it was associated with numbness to the right thigh. The low back condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) or satisfy physical fitness standards. He was issued a permanent L3 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The low back condition characterized as degenerative disc disease (DDD), lumbar spine with chronic LBP was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501 as medically unacceptable. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting rated 10% with likely application of Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals, and was medically separated with a 10% combined disability rating.


CI CONTENTION: “Since being discharged in June of 2000 I have attempted many different jobs however I am not able to keep a job, due to the pain in my back. I will miss more days than the allotted amount of time in just a short period of time. I can no longer sit or stand for any period of time. Sometimes I can barely bend over to tie my shoes or shave. I now have to use a can to get around of the nerve damage my legs will go out. We have had to move into a 1 level house because my legs will give out and i will fall going up or down stairs. I've seen many doctors in the VA and am not a candidate for surgery because of the high risk. I have been told that my condition is degenerative and will only get worse. My PTSD causes me to have to avoid in crowded, loud or hot areas. I went into the Army to make a career, and my dream was cut short, now I will never have the ability, physically or mentally, to have the life I had prior to my injury.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e. (2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting low back condition is addressed below; and, the contended posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) condition is not within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any conditions or contentions not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. The Board acknowledges the CI’s information regarding the significant impairment with which his service-connected condition continues to burden him; but must emphasize that the Disability Evaluation System (DES) has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for anticipated future severity or potential complications of conditions resulting in medical separation. That role and authority is granted by Congress to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), operating under a different set of laws.


 RATING COMPARISON :

Service IPEB – Dated 20040312
 VA (~2 Mos. Post-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Chronic Subjective Low Back Pain 5299-5237 10% Herniated Disc L-4.-L5 and L5-S1, Chronic Lower Lumbar
Spine Strain		 5243 20%* 20040812
Radiculopathy, Right Lower Extremity 8520 10% 20050617
Radiculopathy, Left Lower Extremity 8520 10% 20050617
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 2 20040812
Combined: 10%
 Combined w BLF: 60%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VARD) dated 20041102 ( most proximate to date of separation [DOS]).
*Ratings increased later to 40% from 20100223.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY:

Low Back Condition. The CI had had atraumatic back pain for 2 years prior to aggravating it with lifting a one ton generator while deployed to Iraq in May 2003. He was evaluated and treated by orthopedics, neurosurgery and physical therapy for a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed two level herniated disc disease without spinal stenosis or nerve root compromise. The neurosurgeon notes were not in evidence to review; however, the narrative summary (NARSUM) examiner cited the neurosurgeon counseled the CI that the surgical risks were too high and to continue conservative care. The permanent profile identified the condition as a herniated disc with limitations to include no lifting greater than 20 pounds, walk and run at own pace and distance and able to only complete the walk event for physical fitness testing. The commander’s statement corroborated that the condition limited him in his duties and physical fitness, and further documented the CI was unable to pull, push, bend, run and lift without making his back condition worse, was unable to wear load bearing equipment, and was still working in his MOS within his limitations.

At the MEB exam, the CI reported constant, slight pain which awoke him at night, worsened with prolonged sitting or standing, and bending or heavy lifting. He reported numbness of the right leg and that he took the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory medication (Motrin). The MEB physical exam demonstrated no back tenderness, no signs of disc disease, normal neuromuscular findings of the lower extremities, and the ability to walk on heels and toes. An MRI of the lumbosacral spine, on November 2003, revealed a broad-based disc bulge at L4-5 with narrowing of the right foramen without compression which was in contact with right L4 nerve root without compromise, and a central disc herniation at L5-S1 which caused some ventral flattening of the thecal sac but no spinal stenosis or nerve root compromise. At the VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam, 2 months post-separation, the CI additionally reported a pain intensity of 5 of 10 which increased to 8 of 10 with excessive bending. The back pain was aggravated with squatting, kneeling, climbing, stooping, and with repetitive use. He reported radiating back pain to the right leg, no flare-ups, no incapacitating episodes, and no interference with daily activities or current employment. The C&P exam demonstrated a normal gait and posture, stiffness but not spasm, and positive bilateral straight leg testing (provocative sign for disc disease).

The goniometric range-of-motion (ROM) evaluations in evidence which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, are summarized in the chart below.


“
“
“
Thoracolumbar ROM
(Degrees)
PT ~4 Mos. Pre-Sep		 Ortho ~4 Mos. Pre-Sep MEB ~3 Mos. Pre-Sep VA C&P ~2 Mos. Post-Sep
Flexion (90 Normal)
 FAROMFlexion to toes” 95 0-50
Extension (30)
 FAROM 20 35 0-30
R Lat Flexion (30)
 FAROMflexes to knee crease” 20 0-30
L Lat Flexion (30)
 FAROMflexes to knee crease” 25 0-30
R Rotation (30)
 FAROM # 70 0-30
L Rotation (30)
 FAROM # 70 0-30
Combined (240)
 ## 300 200
Comment
 Painful motion Silent to painful motion Silent to pain Without pain
§4.71a Rating
 10%* 10% 10% 20%
*Conceding § 4.59

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. There is a disparity of the flexion ROM values between the MEB and the VA examinations, with some implications regarding the Board's rating recommendation. The Board thus carefully deliberated its probative value assignment to these conflicting evaluations, and carefully reviewed the service file for corroborating evidence in the 12-month period prior to separation. In assigning probative value, the Board notes that the MEB measurements are consistent with the diagnostic and clinical pathology in evidence; consistent with the flexion ROM documented in other orthopedic and physical therapy exams, and the VA exam performed 2 months later may account for progression of disease as there was no further injury or surgery in evidence for worsening disease. Therefore, based on all evidence and associated conclusions just elaborated, the Board is assigning more probative value to the MEB evaluation. The PEB and VA chose different coding options for the low back condition which had significant implications on the rating for the Board to consider. The PEB assigned a 10% rating coded analogous to 5237 (lumbosacral strain) for limited combined ROM of 300 degrees which is consistent with the VASRD general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine. The PEB specifically cited there were no associated objective neurologic abnormalities for a separate rating under an appropriate diagnostic code. The VA assigned a 20% rating coded 5243 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) for limited flexion for their exam which is also IAW the general rating formula for diseases and injuries of the spine. The VA additionally assigned a 10% rating for radiculopathy for each leg for objective sensory deficits. The Board agreed that the VA chosen code is more representative of the clinical pathology related to the CI’s condition and considered higher rating under the formula for rating intervertebral disc syndrome based on incapacitating episodes. The Board invoked the VASRD definition for incapacitating episodes which requires “bed rest prescribed by a physician and treatment by a physician.” There is no such evidence to support a higher rating under this formula. The Board considered additional rating for peripheral nerve involvement. Board precedent is that a functional impairment tied to fitness is required to support a recommendation for addition of a peripheral nerve rating at separation. The radicular component in evidence in this case consisted primarily of pain, which is subsumed under the general spine rating formula. There is no objective evidence for functional impairment related to the subjective sensory symptoms of the right thigh. Therefore, there is no evidence of ratable peripheral nerve impairment to justify additional rating. The Board, therefore, does not find reasonable doubt favoring a recommendation for an additional rating. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the low back condition.


BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the low back condition and IAW VASRD §4.71a, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no re-characterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Chronic Subjective Low Back Pain 5299-5237 10%
COMBINED
 10%


The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20121016, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record




         Physical Disability Board of Review


 SFMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(TAPD-ZB),

SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation for AR20130010800 (PD201201839)

I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation and hereby deny the individual’s application.
This decision is final. The individual concerned, counsel (if any), and any Members of Congress who have shown interest in this application have been notified of this decision by mail.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:




Encl                                                 
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00160

    Original file (PD2013 00160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CASE: PD1300160 BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE BOARD DATE: 20131105 The presence of functional impairment with a direct impact on fitness is the key determinant in the Board’s decision to recommend any condition for rating as additionally unfitting. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2010 | PD2010-00019

    Original file (PD2010-00019.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB listed “chronic low back pain secondary to intervertebral disc disease,” “chronic neck pain” and “chronic shoulder pain” forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) as medically unacceptable IAW AR 40-501. The Board considered that the MEB and PT exams were closer to the date of separation, comprehensive, more indicative of the CI’s level of disability described in the service records, and therefore had a higher probative value. Minority Opinion : The Action Officer (AO)...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00947

    Original file (PD 2012 00947.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX BRANCH OF SERVICE: ARMY CASE NUMBER: PD1200947 SEPARATION DATE: 20040105 BOARD DATE: 20130307 SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SPC/E-4 (52C10/Air Condition Technician), medically separated for “chronic low back pain due to lumbar disc disease, without neurologic abnormality.” Early in 2002 he experienced sudden...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00120

    Original file (PD2009-00120.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Navy PEB acknowledged the objective findings of mild intervertebral disc bulges from L3 through S1 and mild bilateral neural foraminal narrowing at L4 through S1, they declared these to be conditions related to the mechanical low back pain and not compensable. Using an evaluation completed five months before the time of separation from the Marine Corps, the Veterans Administration (VA) rated this disability as 5238-5243 Disc Protrusion L3 through S1 with Foraminal Stenosis Lumbar Spine...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00044

    Original file (PD-2014-00044.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Separation Date: 20070302 The VA coded the back condition as 5243 (Intervertebral disc syndrome) and rated at 10%.The General Rating Formula for Diseases and Injuries of the Spine considers the CI’s pain symptoms “with or without symptoms such as pain (whether or not it radiates), stiffness or aching in the area of the spine affected by residuals of injury or disease.” The exams proximate to separation did not document limitation of ROM, but both exams documented painful motionwhich would...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-00262

    Original file (PD-2014-00262.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of theVASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Post-Separation) ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Degenerative Disc Disease, Lumbar Region…No Motor Neurologic Deficits5299-524210%Degenerative Arthritis Of The Lumbar Spine524210% * 20080312Other x 3 (Not In Scope)Other x 4 RATING: 10%RATING: 20% *Derived from...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 01954

    Original file (PD 2012 01954.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-Separation) Condition Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam HNP, C6/C7 5243 10% HNP, C6/C7 5237 10% 20040209 Chronic Low Back Pain 5237 10% Lumbar Disc Disease at L3-L4 5242 10% 20040209 No Additional MEB/PEB Entries Other x 2 20040918 Combined: 20% Combined: 20% ANALYSIS SUMMARY: Cervical and Lumbar Spine Condition: The CI had an insidious onset of neck and LBP with radiation to the left arm and left hip, respectively. The examiner diagnosed severe cervical thoracic pain with...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01530

    Original file (PD 2014 01530.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-SepFlexion (90 Normal)“Guarding occurring at 10⁰ off vertical” (with pain)90(70) 68/66/6880Combined (240)Unk/incomplete--240220230Comment“otherwise deferred”; painful motion; tendernessNo painful motion; normal gait; normal peripheral nerve examTender;painful motion“ Pain from 80-90⁰ flexion” §4.71a Rating10%-40%0% (VA NSC)10%10% (VA 10%)The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2009 | PD2009-00411

    Original file (PD2009-00411.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The CI was referred to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), found unfit only for the Low Back Pain condition determined unfit for continued military service and separated at 10% disability using the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Ratings Disabilities (VASRD) and applicable Navy and Department of Defense regulations. The Board also considered the condition of Sciatica and unanimously determined that as the CI only had radiating pain and no motor or sensory deficits, no rating may be applied. ...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD2014 01618

    Original file (PD2014 01618.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    on the left; Normal sensory; mild right leg weakness; reflexes symmetric ; Pos. Contended Mental Health Condition .The Board reviewed the evidence for any indication that a MH condition existed at the time of separation and if so, to render a rating recommendation if that condition was adjudged to be unfitting at the time of separation. Physical Disability Board of Review